Peugeot 205 T16 / Active Systems Special Projects by Lotus (GM)

Published on: Feb 23, 2018 @ 01:41
(C) Jay Auger (RGBS) - website owner & author
Notice: Any form of duplication methods (including but not limited to copy/paste of text and screen capture) of the website's content is strictly forbidden.
Page aussi disponible en FRANÇAIS (click) France


It was quite surprising to see that a duo of Peugeot 205 Turbo 16 Group B homologation road cars were put up at the January 2018 Barrett-Jackson Scottsdale Auction. What is even more surprising is that these cars were owned and consigned by General Motors. One of the cars was listed as having “active suspension” and this of course warranted some further investigation by the Rally Group B Shrine! Initial credit going to Jonathan Grabowski for cracking this “egg” open back in 2013. The Shrine has since come into contact with former Lotus engineer Patrick Peal, former project head Steve Green, and former Research & Development Director Peter Wright, amongst others, to expand the story.



During the 1980’s General Motors was heavily involved in ‘active suspension’ systems as they built and tested several road cars at the Milford Proving Grounds in Michigan. Other such systems were also being developed across the pond by then GM-owned Lotus for use in Formula One. Lotus Engineering subsequently started to test active suspension systems on road cars, first debuting with the company’s own Esprit model, then for GM models such as the Buick Park Avenue and Chevrolet Corvettes.

Lotus’ very first test car with active suspension – the Esprit.

The active suspension development originally conceived for the F1 team in 1981/82 became a major technical offering for Lotus Engineering which ultimately grew into a suite of active systems for vehicle dynamics control.  Circa-1984, Lotus secured a massive contract from GM to develop an array of active systems which would be showcased in the Corvette Indy concept car.

1986 Chevrolet Corvette Indy Concept Car

By this time Lotus had already built several cars with active suspension for GM while the company also worked with Volvo and had sold them an idea for creating active rear steer which worked incredibly well (it was at least +/- 5 degrees of steer or more than enough to control the steer response not just trim it). So Lotus had already gone beyond just active suspension. The particular concept that Lotus were working towards for the Corvette Indy project was ‘active everything’. The ultimate intention being to be able to control all of the forces at the tyre contact patch and achieve maximum performance.

For this special project, Lotus Engineering needed some new tech and some mule vehicles to try it out on; cars that would have lots of performance, be four wheel drive, and ideally be quite easy to modify. While the engineers did look at building something from scratch, they also analysed all of the cars around at the time, ultimately landing on the then current crop of Group B rally cars. The MG Metro 6R4 was a possibility, as was the Ford RS200, but Lotus eventually purchased the last two 205 T16’s (chassis #048 and #091) from Peugeot Talbot Sport‘s (PTS) André de Cortanze.

1984 Peugeot 205 Turbo 16 – 200 were made to satisfy Group B homologation.

Of course when the cars were delivered to Lotus they were brand new so they first had to run them in as road cars. Patrick Peal, one of the engineers involved in the project remembers the experience as “quite a hoot!”:

“I took one from my home to Brighton for the weekend to visit some friends… I discovered pretty early on that if I gave it full throttle for an instant and then backed off I could get a huge flame out of the exhaust. Made for a good effect in the high street at night… It still makes me smile – and there are still people around Brighton talking about the flame-spitting 205 on steroids!”

Project manager Steve Green also recalls driving one of the Pugs quite fondly:

“I know it would pull 7,500 rpm in 5th gear around 130 mph because I did that at GM’s Van Dyke test track, then got told it was a 70 mph speed limit… oh well!”

This excitement was aided by the fact that Lotus decided that the 197 BHP of the ‘standard’ car wasn’t enough, bearing in mind the power drains and added weight of the future special systems (such as hydraulics), so they had decided to purchase the ‘PTS kit’ or ‘Clubman’ upgrade from Peugeot Talbot Sport which would net a more capable 300 BHP amongst other chassis improvements. More information about the upgrade can be found with THIS LINK.

Chassis #91 with special systems and “clubman” factory upgrades.

After the ‘joyride’ was over, Lotus went hard at work developing and fitting chassis #091 with fully integrated active systems. As you could expect, even such sophisticated engineering required a benchmark to make sure that it truly had improved overall performance, so the other 205 Turbo 16, chassis #048, was kept as-is for reference.

The journey of the Corvette Indy mule had begun by the fitment of Lotus’ famed technical offering: active suspension. The purpose being to keep the car’s body flat and level during braking and cornering at the limit of adhesion. To achieve this the system constantly measured pitch, yaw, and tyre slippage on all four wheels – making adjustments as needed.

The project continued by modifying the standard four wheel drive system of the Peugeot with a second differential driven by a hydraulic motor, a sort of ‘tank drive’ system, so that the engineers could accurately control the speed of the front axle compared to the speed of the rear axle and therefore control slippage.

The bulk of the torque control ‘tank drive’ system was neatly installed amidst the Peugeot’s already cramped engine bay.

To do so, the engineers had to compare wheel speed versus true vehicle speed (longitudinally and laterally) which was a challenge – Lotus ended up using two Leitz Correvit optical speed sensors mounted behind the passenger seat to perform this seemingly simple yet very complicated task.

Correvit Box fitted behind the passenger seat.
More of the system was installed in the centre console.

These sensors were a bit like two massive telephoto lenses and were a ‘pig’ to install, calibrate, and keep working, Peal remembers, as they often had to calibrate the lateral speed sensor using a belt sander as a simulated ‘road surface’ whose belt speed could be accurately measured.

The systems could be monitored from the passenger side – equipped with an emergency dump valve if things went awry.

And of course rear steer could play whatever static tricks the Lotus engineering team could dream up as well; same-sense, or opposite-sense giving a crabbing motion, or a very rapid rate of rotation within a small turning circle. In fact, one of the silly party tricks was to apply full lock and full throttle and get massive burnouts in a ridiculously small circle.

“… this left two very black and very small concentric circles on the test track, not much bigger than the wheelbase of the car. Oh, and a dizzy driver!” – Patrick Peal

The ‘brains’ of the operation was fitted under the front bonnet – featuring a digital computer connected to the various systems via an array of data and electrical cables. This effectively took away the space formerly occupied by the spare tyre.

Technical Director Peter Wright hints towards the car also being equipped with anti-locking brake and traction control systems activated via ‘pedal pushers’:

“We did very little development on these two systems, although I do remember we got them working and they were reasonably effective.”

One would be hard-pressed to find any clues of the presence of all these special systems just by looking at the car from the outside, with the exception of a single ‘canard’-looking appendage found only on the right side engine panel – it served as a ‘bodywork extension’ to allow the engineers to fit part of them around the engine.

Lotus then proceeded to test the full battery of active systems quite extensively in various venues around Europe; UK, France, and even on an ice lake in Sweden. This would tend to be confirmed by the car’s odometer currently sitting at 15,915 kms. The benchmark car in comparison had its odometer reading a pretty 2,192 kms at the time of sale.

“I remember that the torque control system was very noisy, and one could tell whether it was understeering or oversteering while sat in the office, just by hearing it out on the track!” – Peter Wright

Once Lotus had sorted it all out the main project was then to build the Corvette Indy. However, there were some major problems which left the concept car as a non-functional show piece in 1986. By then the two Peugeots were already shipped out to America and sat as part of the GM Heritage Collection for about three decades before being sold-off at auction.

After the defunct Indy project, GM shifted their intentions to an attempt at implementing active suspension into the production Chevrolet Corvette ZR1. Again, further problems and exorbitant costs prevented this from happening. The active systems developed with the Peugeot mule were ultimately ‘rebooted’ in the 1990 Chevrolet Engineering Research Vehicle / CERV III.

The CERV III – considered to be the spiritual completion of the Corvette Indy project.

Not much is known after this point at how the hard work of the Lotus engineers might have directly ended up affecting other projects at GM. However, with all of the rumours of the next C8 generation Chevrolet Corvette finally going mid-engine, possibly with active systems, it would be tempting to trace its lineage back to the Indy / CERV III and its Peugeot mule. It is safe to assume that if the future yields such a product then you’ll need be thanking the little Pug.

“…the systems were awesome. We were all very sad to say goodbye to the two Pugs when they were shipped to America at the end of the project.” – Patrick Peal

“The car in its standard form was pretty good already although it needed a certain amount of commitment from the driver to fully exploit its performance. The active version was an amazing machine and we learnt a lot about vehicle dynamics from it.” – Steve Green

“Great project, and good to know the cars live on.” – Peter Wright

The two “Detroit Lions” would seemingly collect warehouse dust somewhere in America up until 2018 when GM ultimately decided that it was time to part ways with these cars. Both were first consigned at the Barrett-Jackson Scottsdale Auction in January.

“G.H.” (anonymity requested), the buyer of the first car (the benchmark) on the Scottsdale auction block, (chassis #048 / VIN VF3741R76E5100048) found the story on the website and has since graciously accepted to share information about his 205 T16. It would seem that the Peugeot is missing some upgrades normally found in the Clubman / PTS package: a mystery that the Shrine is currently hard at work solving. The new owner nonetheless happily plans on enjoying the car with occasional drives up the scenic American west coast.

The GM Peugeots at the 2018 Barrett-Jackson Scottsdale auction. (#048 front – #091 back)

The second car (chassis #091 / VIN VF3741R76E5100091) was subsequently relisted in the Motostalgia Amelia Island Auction in March. The car seemingly still sports most if not all of the special systems implemented by Lotus. However, it is more than likely that they were rendered inoperable with the exception of the active suspension. The Shrine has come into contact with the auction house to provide the proper backstory for the car as to correctly preserve this undeniable, yet very uncanny, part of Group B history.

***The Rally Group B Shrine invites the future owner of this very special car to get in touch via THIS CONTACT FORM.***


(C) Article by Jay Auger – website owner & author


  • Jonathan Grabowski (sons of taki), for breaking part of this story back in 2013.
  • Patrick Peal, former Lotus engineer, for accepting to share more of the story.
  • Steve Green, former Lotus project manager, for adding some much welcomed insights and extra info.
  • Peter Wright, former Lotus R&D director, for sharing last minute details.
  • G.H.“, for sharing information, pictures, and for supporting the Shrine’s endeavour at preserving the history of Group B.